biome: alter in response

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.48
, community
Weight: 0.36
, challenge
Weight: 0.36
, unit
Weight: 0.32
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.31
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.31
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.30
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.30
, scenery
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
alter in response 1.00
alter in response to changes 0.96
alter in response to changes in climate 0.93
change 0.79
is altered 0.79
need altered 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(community, change)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(biome, alter in response)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(community, change)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(community, change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(community, change)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(biome, alter in response)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ecosystem, change)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, change)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(biodiversity, change)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(biome, alter in response)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biome, change)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(biome, is altered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(biome, alter in response to changes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response to changes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(biome, change)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(biome, alter in response to changes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(biome, alter in response to changes in climate)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(biome, is altered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(biome, alter in response to changes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biome, alter in response to changes in climate)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(biome, need altered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(biome, change)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(biome, is altered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(biome, alter in response to changes in climate)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(biome, need altered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response to changes in climate)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(biome, need altered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(biome, need altered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biome, is altered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(biome, change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(biome, alter in response)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(community, change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ecosystem, change)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(biodiversity, change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(biome, alter in response)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(community, change)