biome: be different from habitat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.48
, community
Weight: 0.36
, challenge
Weight: 0.36
, unit
Weight: 0.32
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.31
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.31
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.30
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.30
, scenery
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from habitat 1.00
show little biodiversity 0.80
show biodiversity 0.79
differ from ecosystem 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(biome, be different from habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biome, show biodiversity)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(biome, differ from ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(biome, show little biodiversity)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(biome, show biodiversity)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biome, differ from ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(biome, differ from ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(biome, show little biodiversity)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(biome, show biodiversity)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(biome, show little biodiversity)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(biome, show biodiversity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(biome, differ from ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(biome, show little biodiversity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biome, be different from habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(biome, be different from habitat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(biome, be different from habitat)