biome: has pitch keys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.48
, community
Weight: 0.36
, challenge
Weight: 0.36
, unit
Weight: 0.32
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.31
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.31
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.30
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.30
, scenery
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has pitch keys 1.00
has pitch key 0.87
work for keys 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(ecology, has pitch key)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(ecology, has pitch key)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, has pitch key)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(biome, has pitch keys)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(biome, work for keys)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(biome, work for keys)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(biome, work for keys)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(biome, has pitch key)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(biome, has pitch key)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(biome, has pitch key)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(biome, work for keys)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(biome, has pitch key)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(biome, has pitch keys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(biome, has pitch keys)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(biome, has pitch keys)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ecology, has pitch key)