biome: has quality system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, topic
Weight: 0.48
, community
Weight: 0.36
, challenge
Weight: 0.36
, unit
Weight: 0.32
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.31
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.31
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.30
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.30
, scenery
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality system 1.00
has quality bad 0.82
be considered system 0.81
is open system 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(biome, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(biome, be considered system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(biome, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(biome, is open system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(biome, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(biome, be considered system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(biome, be considered system)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biome, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(biome, is open system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(biome, is open system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(biome, be considered system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(biome, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biome, is open system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(biome, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(biome, has quality system)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biome, has quality system)