bird: be pet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
, dead bird
Weight: 0.48
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, turkey
Weight: 0.74
, seagull
Weight: 0.74
, blue bird
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pet 1.00
be person pet 0.97
be good pet 0.96
be used to have for pet 0.95
be used to keep as pet 0.92
fear cat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(chicken, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(chicken, be pet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(chicken, be pet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(chicken, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bird, be pet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(bird, be pet)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(bird, be good pet)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bird, fear cat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bird, fear cat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bird, be good pet)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(bird, be good pet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(bird, be good pet)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bird, fear cat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bird, fear cat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bird, be pet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chicken, be pet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(bird, be pet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(chicken, be pet)