bird: has physical part beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dead bird
Weight: 0.67
, chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, wren
Weight: 0.77
, heron
Weight: 0.77
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beaks 1.00
have long beaks 0.94
need beaks 0.94
use beaks 0.94
have different beaks 0.94
nowadays have beaks 0.92
have yellow beaks 0.92
have beaks of shapes 0.92
have sharp beaks 0.91
open beaks 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)