bird: is birds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dead bird
Weight: 0.67
, chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, wren
Weight: 0.77
, heron
Weight: 0.77
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is birds 1.00
be called birds 0.98
be considered birds 0.96
eat birds 0.94
eat other birds 0.92
make birds nest 0.91
have important to birds wings 0.91
reproduce birds 0.90
protect from birds 0.90
be more beautiful than birds 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be considered birds)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wren, is birds)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wren, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(wren, is birds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, be considered birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, be considered birds)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bird, is birds)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(bird, eat birds)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(bird, eat birds)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(bird, eat birds)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bird, eat birds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(bird, is birds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(wren, is birds)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bird, is birds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, be considered birds)