bird: traveling through water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dead bird
Weight: 0.67
, chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, wren
Weight: 0.77
, heron
Weight: 0.77
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
traveling through water 1.00
travel 0.80
get water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(owl, get water)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, get water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, get water)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, get water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(owl, get water)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(owl, get water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bird, traveling through water)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(bird, get water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(bird, get water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bird, get water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(bird, get water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bird, traveling through water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, get water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bird, traveling through water)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(owl, get water)