birmingham: be important to wider world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.60
, town
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings london
Weight: 0.62
, portsmouth
Weight: 0.35
, liverpool
Weight: 0.35
, leeds
Weight: 0.35
, sheffield
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to wider world 1.00
be important to world 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(london, be important to world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(london, be important to world)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(london, be important to world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(birmingham, be important to wider world)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(birmingham, be important to world)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be important to world)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be important to world)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(birmingham, be important to world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be important to wider world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(birmingham, be important to wider world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be important to wider world)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(london, be important to world)