:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tori, is awesome)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bitch, is crazy)
Similarity expansion
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(bitch, is awesome)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bitch, is awesome)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bitch, is crazy)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(bitch, is crazy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(tori, is awesome)