black pepper: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spice
Weight: 0.70
, ingredient
Weight: 0.68
, seasoning
Weight: 0.65
, flavor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings black currant
Weight: 0.36
, cumin
Weight: 0.36
, ginger
Weight: 0.36
, white chocolate
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
is cat 0.80
go bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.10
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(white chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(ginger, is cat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(white chocolate, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(white chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(ginger, is cat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(ginger, is cat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(white chocolate, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(ginger, is cat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(black pepper, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)