blackjack: be illegal in montana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents favorite
Weight: 0.58
, game
Weight: 0.56
, roulette
Weight: 0.54
, title
Weight: 0.52
, weapon
Weight: 0.48
Siblings poker
Weight: 0.34
, chess game
Weight: 0.34
, solitaire
Weight: 0.33
, pinball
Weight: 0.33
, hockey game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in montana 1.00
is illegal 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(roulette, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(title, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(title, is illegal)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(roulette, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(title, is illegal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(roulette, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(poker, is illegal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pinball, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(roulette, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(title, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.17
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(poker, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(poker, is illegal)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(pinball, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pinball, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(blackjack, be illegal in montana)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, is illegal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(blackjack, is illegal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(blackjack, is illegal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(blackjack, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(title, is illegal)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roulette, is illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(poker, is illegal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pinball, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(title, is illegal)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blackjack, be illegal in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(roulette, is illegal)