blade: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	thing Weight: 0.60 , character Weight: 0.58 , method Weight: 0.57 , movie Weight: 0.56 , product Weight: 0.55
Siblings	razor Weight: 0.33 , kitchen utensil Weight: 0.33 , spear Weight: 0.33 , nail clipper Weight: 0.33 , time machine Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96
has quality better	0.90
is varian bad	0.87
is good mcoc	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(blade, has quality bad)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(movie, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(blade, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(blade, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(movie, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(razor, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(razor, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(razor, has quality better)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(spear, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(blade, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(blade, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(movie, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(blade, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(razor, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(razor, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(spear, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(spear, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(razor, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(razor, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(nail clipper, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(nail clipper, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(razor, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(razor, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(blade, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(blade, has quality good)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(blade, has quality better)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(blade, has quality good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(blade, has quality good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(blade, is varian bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(blade, is varian bad)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(blade, is good mcoc)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(blade, has quality better)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(blade, is varian bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(blade, is varian bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(blade, has quality better)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(blade, is good mcoc)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(blade, is good mcoc)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(blade, is good mcoc)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Salient(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(blade, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(movie, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(spear, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(razor, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(nail clipper, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(razor, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(razor, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(blade, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(movie, has quality better)