bland: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adjective
Weight: 0.42
, woman
Weight: 0.39
, area
Weight: 0.33
, theme
Weight: 0.33
, word
Weight: 0.33
Siblings cute
Weight: 0.29
, redhead
Weight: 0.27
, waitress
Weight: 0.27
, first lady
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
is worth 2018 0.93
is net worth 2018 0.81
is net worth 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bland, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(bland, is worth 2018)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bland, is worth 2018)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(bland, is worth 2018)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bland, is net worth 2018)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(bland, is net worth 2018)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(bland, is net worth 2018)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(bland, is worth 2018)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bland, is net worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bland, is net worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bland, is net worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bland, is net worth 2018)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bland, is net worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(bland, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bland, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(bland, has quality worth)