bleacher: be at stadium

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, area
Weight: 0.44
, object
Weight: 0.43
, item
Weight: 0.43
Siblings sidewalk
Weight: 0.31
, stadium
Weight: 0.31
, playground
Weight: 0.31
, school cafeteria
Weight: 0.31
, baseball game
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at stadium 1.00
be at football stadium 0.95
be at baseball stadium 0.94
be see in baseball stadium 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(baseball game, be see in baseball stadium)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(baseball game, be see in baseball stadium)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(baseball game, be see in baseball stadium)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bleacher, be at stadium)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(bleacher, be at baseball stadium)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bleacher, be at football stadium)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bleacher, be at football stadium)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(bleacher, be at football stadium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bleacher, be at football stadium)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bleacher, be at baseball stadium)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bleacher, be at baseball stadium)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bleacher, be at baseball stadium)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bleacher, be at stadium)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(bleacher, be at stadium)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(bleacher, be at stadium)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(baseball game, be see in baseball stadium)