blind people: have sex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents group
Weight: 0.61
, everyone
Weight: 0.60
, individual
Weight: 0.59
, pedestrian
Weight: 0.52
, thing
Weight: 0.52
Siblings poor people
Weight: 0.34
, deaf people
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, different people
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sex 1.00
be gay 0.77
see porn 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(poor people, have sex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(poor people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(poor people, have sex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(blind people, have sex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have sex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(blind people, have sex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(blind people, have sex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(poor people, have sex)