blind: wear eyeglasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.56
, track
Weight: 0.53
, treatment
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.49
Siblings blind people
Weight: 0.33
, color blindness
Weight: 0.31
, wheelchair
Weight: 0.31
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.31
, electronic device
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear eyeglasses 1.00
wear dark eyeglasses 0.98
wear glasses 0.88
wear dark glasses 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(blind people, wear glasses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(blind people, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(blind people, wear glasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(blind, wear eyeglasses)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(blind, wear glasses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(blind, wear glasses)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(blind, wear glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(blind, wear dark eyeglasses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(blind, wear dark eyeglasses)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blind, wear eyeglasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blind, wear eyeglasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blind, wear eyeglasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(blind people, wear glasses)