blindness: is prevalent

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.65
, symptom
Weight: 0.64
, miracle
Weight: 0.62
, handicap
Weight: 0.62
Siblings macular degeneration
Weight: 0.36
, glaucoma
Weight: 0.36
, cataract
Weight: 0.35
, bipolar disorder
Weight: 0.35
, paralysis
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is prevalent 1.00
be more prevalent in diabetics 0.82
is common 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bipolar disorder, is common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bipolar disorder, is common)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bipolar disorder, is common)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(blindness, is prevalent)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is common)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(blindness, is common)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(blindness, is common)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(blindness, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(blindness, is prevalent)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bipolar disorder, is common)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(blindness, is prevalent)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(glaucoma, be more prevalent in diabetics)