blinker: has state problems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.27
, light
Weight: 0.25
Siblings traffic light
Weight: 0.25
, light bulb
Weight: 0.25
, red light
Weight: 0.25
, headlight
Weight: 0.24
, blue light
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problems 1.00
problems 0.94
has state problem 0.93
problem 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(blinker, has state problems)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(blinker, problems)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(blinker, problems)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(blinker, problems)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(blinker, has state problem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(blinker, has state problem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(blinker, problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(blinker, has state problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(blinker, problem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(blinker, problem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(blinker, has state problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(blinker, problems)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(blinker, problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(blinker, has state problems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(blinker, has state problems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(blinker, has state problems)