blob: was grow in gardens

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.60
, film
Weight: 0.53
, file
Weight: 0.49
, type
Weight: 0.45
Siblings ice cube
Weight: 0.33
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.33
, fart
Weight: 0.33
, lizard
Weight: 0.33
, freckle
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was grow in gardens 1.00
was grow in gardens made 0.98
was grow in beloved gardens 0.93
was grow in beloved gardens made 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(blob, was grow in gardens)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(blob, was grow in gardens made)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens made)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(blob, was grow in gardens made)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blob, was grow in beloved gardens)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(blob, was grow in beloved gardens)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(blob, was grow in beloved gardens made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(blob, was grow in beloved gardens)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(blob, was grow in beloved gardens made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(blob, was grow in gardens made)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blob, was grow in beloved gardens made)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blob, was grow in beloved gardens)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(blob, was grow in beloved gardens made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blob, was grow in gardens)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(blob, was grow in gardens)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(blob, was grow in gardens)