block: be in back illegal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.59
, obstacle
Weight: 0.57
, property
Weight: 0.55
Siblings subway stop
Weight: 0.36
, apartment building
Weight: 0.32
, corner
Weight: 0.32
, intersection
Weight: 0.32
, driveway
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in back illegal 1.00
be in illegal 0.94
is illegal 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(subway stop, is illegal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(subway stop, is illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(subway stop, is illegal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(block, be in back illegal)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(block, be in illegal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(block, is illegal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(block, be in illegal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(block, be in illegal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(block, be in illegal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(block, is illegal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(block, is illegal)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(block, is illegal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(block, be in back illegal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(block, be in back illegal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(block, be in back illegal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(subway stop, is illegal)