bloom: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents effect
Weight: 0.59
, journal
Weight: 0.55
, event
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, critic
Weight: 0.52
Siblings peony
Weight: 0.52
, brussels sprout
Weight: 0.33
, lily
Weight: 0.32
, flower arrangement
Weight: 0.32
, bud
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful to life 0.93
CAN can harmful 0.87
be harmful to aquatic life 0.82
is toxic 0.79
is dangerous 0.79
is potentially dangerous 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lily, is toxic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lily, is toxic)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lily, is toxic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(bloom, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bloom, be harmful to life)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(bloom, be harmful to life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bloom, be harmful to life)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bloom, be harmful to aquatic life)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(bloom, is toxic)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bloom, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bloom, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(bloom, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lily, is toxic)