blue jay: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
, dead bird
Weight: 0.59
, mouse
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blue bird
Weight: 0.68
, jay
Weight: 0.38
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, great blue heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(jay, be in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(jay, be in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(blue jay, be in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(blue jay, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(jay, be in canada)