blue line: be in snow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents red line
Weight: 0.78
, line
Weight: 0.72
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.39
, power line
Weight: 0.38
, telephone line
Weight: 0.37
, fishing line
Weight: 0.35
, blue book
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in snow 1.00
be in snow at olympics 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(blue line, be in snow)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blue line, be in snow at olympics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(blue line, be in snow at olympics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(blue line, be in snow at olympics)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(blue line, be in snow at olympics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(blue line, be in snow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blue line, be in snow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(blue line, be in snow)