blue line: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents red line
Weight: 0.78
, line
Weight: 0.72
, thing
Weight: 0.62
Siblings straight line
Weight: 0.39
, power line
Weight: 0.38
, telephone line
Weight: 0.37
, fishing line
Weight: 0.35
, blue book
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(power line, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(power line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(power line, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(blue line, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(blue line, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(blue line, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(blue line, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(power line, has quality bad)