blue whale: were hunted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whale
Weight: 0.86
, mammal
Weight: 0.76
, creature
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, dolphin
Weight: 0.63
Siblings orca
Weight: 0.55
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.45
, fin whale
Weight: 0.44
, whale shark
Weight: 0.44
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
were hunted 1.00
was hunted 0.98
is hunted 0.97
get hunted 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is hunted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is hunted)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(orca, were hunted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, were hunted)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fin whale, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(orca, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(orca, were hunted)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fin whale, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(fin whale, is hunted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(humpback whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, were hunted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(humpback whale, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is hunted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(whale shark, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(blue whale, were hunted)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(blue whale, was hunted)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(blue whale, is hunted)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(blue whale, get hunted)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(blue whale, was hunted)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, get hunted)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(blue whale, were hunted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(orca, were hunted)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(fin whale, is hunted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is hunted)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(whale shark, is hunted)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, were hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(humpback whale, were hunted)