board game: be at cupboard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dvd player
Weight: 0.68
, computer game
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.65
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings backgammon
Weight: 0.66
, monopoly
Weight: 0.62
, crossword puzzle
Weight: 0.62
, chess set
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cupboard 1.00
be store in cupboard 0.96
be at drawer 0.82
be at closet 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(board game, be at cupboard)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(thing, be store in cupboard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be at cupboard)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(chess set, be at drawer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(thing, be store in cupboard)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(chess set, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(chess set, be at cupboard)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(chess set, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(chess set, be at drawer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(board game, be at cupboard)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(board game, be at cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(chess set, be at cupboard)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(chess set, be at drawer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(board game, be at cupboard)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(thing, be store in cupboard)