board: be with tankers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings panel
Weight: 0.64
, at
Weight: 0.53
, arb
Weight: 0.38
, council
Weight: 0.36
, commission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with tankers 1.00
be used on trucks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(board, be with tankers)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(board, be used on trucks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(board, be used on trucks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(board, be used on trucks)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(board, be used on trucks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(board, be with tankers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(board, be with tankers)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(board, be with tankers)