boater: fish in lake and river

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents user
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.47
, group
Weight: 0.46
, patron
Weight: 0.41
Siblings angler
Weight: 0.46
, cyclist
Weight: 0.31
, computer user
Weight: 0.31
, hiker
Weight: 0.31
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
fish in lake and river 1.00
fish by lake 0.97
fish 0.85
be at boat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(angler, fish by lake)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(angler, fish)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(angler, fish by lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(angler, fish by lake)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(angler, fish) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(angler, fish)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(boater, fish in lake and river)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(boater, be at boat)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(boater, be at boat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(boater, be at boat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(boater, be at boat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(boater, fish in lake and river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(angler, fish by lake)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boater, fish in lake and river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(angler, fish)