boiling point: increase going down

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, property
Weight: 0.60
, movie
Weight: 0.56
Siblings pressure point
Weight: 0.35
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.33
, bucket
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase going down 1.00
increase going 0.95
increase going down group 7 0.93
increase down group 0.90
increase from h2s h2te 0.86
increase with increasing mass 0.81
increase with number 0.80
increase with size 0.79
increase with mass 0.78
rises with rise of pressure 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going down)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(point, rises with rise of pressure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going down)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(point, rises with rise of pressure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(point, rises with rise of pressure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(point, increase from h2s h2te) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase going down)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(point, rises with rise of pressure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase going down)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase going down)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase going)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase going)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase with increasing mass)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase with size)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down group 7)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase with mass)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase with number)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(boiling point, rises with rise of pressure)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(boiling point, rises with rise of pressure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase with number)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase with number)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase with number)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(boiling point, rises with rise of pressure)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase with increasing mass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase with size)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase with mass)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, rises with rise of pressure)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase down group)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase down group)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase down group)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase down group)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase with mass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase with increasing mass)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase with size)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase with increasing mass)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase with mass)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase with size)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(boiling point, increase going down group 7)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(boiling point, increase going down group 7)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going down group 7)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(boiling point, increase going down)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(point, rises with rise of pressure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(point, increase from h2s h2te)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(boiling point, increase going down) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(point, rises with rise of pressure)