:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(ada, is eastman)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ada, is ehi)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(ada, is ehi)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ada, is ehi)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(bole, is folsom)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bole, is nihaal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(bole, is nihaal)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(bole, is folsom)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ada, is ehi)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bole, is hadippa)
⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ada, is eastman)