bole: is i d

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.17
Siblings taj mahal
Weight: 0.20
, mahatma gandhi
Weight: 0.20
, immanuel kant
Weight: 0.19
, ada
Weight: 0.19
, charles darwin
Weight: 0.19

Related properties

Property Similarity
is i d 1.00
is ny 0.79
is george 0.77
be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff 0.76
be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff from movie 0.76
have mc 0.76
is na 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(name, have mc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bole, is i d)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(name, have mc)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(name, have mc)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff from movie)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(name, have mc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bole, is i d)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff from movie) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff from movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bole, is i d)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(bole, is ny)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(bole, is ny)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(bole, is na)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bole, is na)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(bole, is ny)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bole, is na)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bole, is ny)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(bole, is na)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bole, is i d)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(name, have mc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(ada, be nicole sanger donna lamonsoff from movie)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(bole, is i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(name, have mc)