bond: be between a-t

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt instrument
Weight: 0.63
, loan
Weight: 0.60
, savings account
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings peptide bond
Weight: 0.79
, friendship
Weight: 0.62
, zero coupon bond
Weight: 0.62
, indemnity
Weight: 0.55
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be between a-t 1.00
be between women 0.87
be between girls 0.86
occur between elements 0.81
form between elements 0.80
be with ppo 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(indemnity, be with ppo)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be between women)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be between girls)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(friendship, be between women) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(friendship, be between women)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(friendship, be between girls) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(friendship, be between girls)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(indemnity, be with ppo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(indemnity, be with ppo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bond, be between a-t)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(bond, occur between elements)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bond, occur between elements)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bond, occur between elements)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(bond, occur between elements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bond, be between a-t)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(indemnity, be with ppo)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(friendship, be between women)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bond, be between a-t) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(friendship, be between girls)