bond: be with one person

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt instrument
Weight: 0.63
, loan
Weight: 0.60
, savings account
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings peptide bond
Weight: 0.79
, friendship
Weight: 0.62
, zero coupon bond
Weight: 0.62
, indemnity
Weight: 0.55
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with one person 1.00
be determined for person 0.87
be with other 0.77
be determined for accused person 0.76
be with ppo 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(indemnity, be with ppo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(indemnity, be with ppo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(indemnity, be with ppo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bond, be with one person)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bond, be determined for accused person)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bond, be with other)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bond, be with other)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(bond, be with other)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bond, be with other)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(bond, be determined for accused person)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bond, be determined for accused person)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bond, be determined for accused person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bond, be with one person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bond, be with one person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(bond, be with one person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(indemnity, be with ppo)