bond: decrease in value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents debt instrument
Weight: 0.63
, loan
Weight: 0.60
, savings account
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings peptide bond
Weight: 0.79
, friendship
Weight: 0.62
, zero coupon bond
Weight: 0.62
, indemnity
Weight: 0.55
, bondholder
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
decrease in value 1.00
increase in value 0.96
decrease point 0.89
change value 0.86
be to value 0.84
is value 0.84
decrease melting point 0.83
lose value 0.82
be to value important 0.82
is important value 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bond, decrease in value)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bond, decrease in value)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(loan, be to value important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value important)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loan, be to value)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(friendship, is important value)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(friendship, is value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(loan, be to value)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(loan, be to value important)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(bond, decrease in value)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(friendship, is value)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(friendship, is value)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(friendship, is important value)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(friendship, is important value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bond, decrease in value)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(bond, increase in value)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(bond, increase in value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bond, increase in value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bond, increase in value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bond, decrease in value)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(friendship, is value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(friendship, is important value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(loan, be to value)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(bond, decrease in value)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(loan, be to value important)