bonus: be taxed at higher rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.60
, promotion
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings score
Weight: 0.59
, ending
Weight: 0.45
, award
Weight: 0.33
, purse
Weight: 0.32
, swag
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be taxed at higher rate 1.00
be taxed at rate 0.97
is taxed higher 0.96
get taxed higher 0.96
be taxed at higher rate canada 0.94
be taxed at 50 percentage 0.92
be taxed at 50 0.92
be taxed at 45 0.92
be taxed at 40 0.92
be taxed at 40 percent 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed higher)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(bonus, is taxed higher)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 40 percent)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 50 percentage)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at rate)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at rate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 40)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed higher)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at rate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at rate)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 40 percent)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 50 percentage)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bonus, is taxed higher)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 40)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed higher)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 40 percent)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bonus, is taxed higher)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 50 percentage)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed higher)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(bonus, is taxed higher)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 40)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at 45)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 40 percent)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 50 percentage)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 50)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 40)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at 45)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate)