bonus: be taxed higher in canada

Property	Similarity
be taxed higher in canada	1.00
get taxed higher canada	0.99
be taxed high canada	0.98
be taxed at higher rate canada	0.97
be taxed canada	0.97
get taxed canada	0.96
be taxed at rate canada	0.95
be taxed high australia	0.93
be taxed australia	0.91
get taxed higher	0.91

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed canada)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed canada)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed canada)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed canada)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed canada)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed canada)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed higher)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed canada)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed australia)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed canada)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed higher canada)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed australia)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed higher canada)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed high canada)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed higher canada)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed high canada)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed australia)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed australia)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed high canada)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed high canada)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed higher)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at rate canada)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at rate canada)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at rate canada)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed higher canada)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at rate canada)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed higher)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed high australia)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed high australia)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.34

Salient(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(bonus, be taxed high australia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed high australia)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed at higher rate canada)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(bonus, be taxed higher in canada) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed higher)

Parents	prize Weight: 0.64 , sum Weight: 0.60 , promotion Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.58
Siblings	score Weight: 0.59 , ending Weight: 0.45 , award Weight: 0.33 , purse Weight: 0.32 , swag Weight: 0.31

bonus: be taxed higher in canada

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible