boo: be radley protective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, song
Weight: 0.47
, brand
Weight: 0.43
, everything
Weight: 0.42
Siblings chant
Weight: 0.33
, scream
Weight: 0.33
, hate
Weight: 0.33
, laughing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be radley protective 1.00
be protective 1.00
is radely protective 1.00
is protective 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(boo, be radley protective)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boo, is radely protective)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(boo, is radely protective)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(boo, be protective)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(boo, be protective)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(boo, be protective)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(boo, is protective)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(boo, is radely protective)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(boo, be protective)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(boo, is radely protective)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(boo, is protective)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(boo, is protective)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(boo, is protective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(boo, be radley protective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(boo, be radley protective)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(boo, be radley protective)