book: be better than movies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than movies 1.00
is better movies 0.98
be considered better than movies 0.97
is better then movies 0.95
be better than movie 0.95
be inherently better than movies 0.90
be typically better than movie 0.90
is movies 0.89
is then movies 0.89
become movies 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(book, be better than movies)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(book, be better than movie)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be better than movie)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movie)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(book, be typically better than movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(book, be typically better than movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(book, be typically better than movie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be better than movie)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(book, be typically better than movie)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(book, be better than movies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(book, be better than movies)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(book, be better than movies)