border: be at map

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bookstore
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.59
, company
Weight: 0.58
, chain
Weight: 0.58
, boundary
Weight: 0.57
Siblings south dakota
Weight: 0.33
, south park
Weight: 0.33
, north dakota
Weight: 0.33
, south
Weight: 0.33
, north
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at map 1.00
be at atlas or map 0.93
be used to political map 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boundary, be at map)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(border, be at map)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(boundary, be at atlas or map)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(border, be at map)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(boundary, be at atlas or map)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(boundary, be at map)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be at map)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be at atlas or map)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(boundary, be at map)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(border, be at map)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(boundary, be at atlas or map)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(border, be at map)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(border, be at map)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(border, be used to political map)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(border, be used to political map)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(border, be used to political map)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(border, be used to political map)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(border, be at map)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(border, be at map)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boundary, be at map)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boundary, be at atlas or map)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boundary, be at map)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(border, be at map)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boundary, be at atlas or map)