bos: is bad guy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents anyone
Weight: 0.30
, team
Weight: 0.28
Siblings swansea
Weight: 0.25
, portugal
Weight: 0.25
, denver
Weight: 0.25
, pittsburgh
Weight: 0.25
, liverpool
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad guy 1.00
is guy 0.96
has quality bad 0.76
is flowey scary 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(swansea, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liverpool, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liverpool, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(liverpool, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(swansea, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(swansea, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bos, is bad guy)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bos, is guy)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(bos, is guy)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(bos, is guy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(bos, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(bos, is flowey scary)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bos, is bad guy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(bos, is bad guy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(swansea, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bos, is bad guy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(liverpool, has quality bad)