boston: is warm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, chicago
Weight: 0.62
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.62
, new york city
Weight: 0.61
Siblings latin america
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36
, baltimore
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is warm 1.00
is colder 0.76
have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(new york city, is colder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boston, is warm)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boston, is warm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(new york city, is colder)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is colder)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(new york city, is colder) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(boston, is warm)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(boston, is warm)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(boston, is warm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(boston, is warm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new york city, is colder)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(new york city, have warmer average temperatures than pittsburgh)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(boston, is warm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(new york city, is colder)