botanist: consider squash fruits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.61
, biologist
Weight: 0.53
, plant
Weight: 0.52
, researcher
Weight: 0.51
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.36
, geologist
Weight: 0.35
, astronomer
Weight: 0.35
, archaeologist
Weight: 0.35
, physicist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
consider squash fruits 1.00
consider fruits 0.91
consider tomato 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(botanist, consider squash fruits)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(botanist, consider fruits)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(botanist, consider fruits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(botanist, consider fruits)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(botanist, consider tomato)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(botanist, consider tomato)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(botanist, consider tomato)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(botanist, consider tomato)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(botanist, consider fruits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(botanist, consider squash fruits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(botanist, consider squash fruits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(botanist, consider squash fruits)