botswana: have low population density

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.56
, nation
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.54
, economy
Weight: 0.50
, south africa
Weight: 0.50
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, united kingdom
Weight: 0.28
, central american country
Weight: 0.28
, czech republic
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low population density 1.00
have population density 0.97
have low population 0.92
have population 0.86
have low hdi 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(botswana, have low population density)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(place, have low population density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(botswana, have low population density)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(botswana, have low population density)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(botswana, have population density)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(botswana, have population density)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(botswana, have population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(botswana, have population density)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(botswana, have population)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(botswana, have low population density)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(botswana, have low population density)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(botswana, have low population density)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)