bouncer: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, people
Weight: 0.51
, device
Weight: 0.49
, security guard
Weight: 0.47
Siblings gentleman
Weight: 0.31
, punch
Weight: 0.31
, golf ball
Weight: 0.31
, dance club
Weight: 0.31
, bat
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be at restaurant 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(gentleman, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(gentleman, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(gentleman, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(bouncer, be at bar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bouncer, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bouncer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(gentleman, be at restaurant)