boundary: be important in relationships

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, limit
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings parking structure
Weight: 0.32
, fence
Weight: 0.32
, sphere
Weight: 0.31
, partition
Weight: 0.31
, matrix
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in relationships 1.00
be in relationships important 1.00
be in relationships 0.97
be important in healthy relationships 0.94
be important in friendships 0.87
be important in work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(boundary, be important in relationships)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(boundary, be in relationships)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be in relationships)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(boundary, be in relationships)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boundary, be in relationships important)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(boundary, be in relationships important)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(boundary, be in relationships important)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(boundary, be in relationships)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(boundary, be important in healthy relationships)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(boundary, be important in healthy relationships)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(boundary, be important in healthy relationships)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be in relationships important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(boundary, be important in friendships)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(boundary, be important in friendships)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be important in healthy relationships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be important in friendships)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(boundary, be important in friendships)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(boundary, be important in work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(boundary, be important in work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(boundary, be important in work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be important in work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boundary, be important in relationships)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(boundary, be important in relationships) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(boundary, be important in relationships)