boundary: have largest earthquakes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, limit
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.57
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, object
Weight: 0.54
Siblings parking structure
Weight: 0.32
, fence
Weight: 0.32
, sphere
Weight: 0.31
, partition
Weight: 0.31
, matrix
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have largest earthquakes 1.00
have earthquakes 0.91
cause earthquakes 0.88
have shallow earthquakes 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(boundary, have largest earthquakes)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(boundary, have earthquakes)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(boundary, cause earthquakes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(boundary, cause earthquakes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(boundary, have earthquakes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(boundary, cause earthquakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(boundary, have earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(boundary, cause earthquakes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(boundary, have earthquakes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(boundary, have shallow earthquakes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(boundary, have shallow earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(boundary, have shallow earthquakes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(boundary, have shallow earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(boundary, have largest earthquakes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(boundary, have largest earthquakes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(boundary, have largest earthquakes)