boy scout: wear uniforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents boy
Weight: 0.75
, youth
Weight: 0.67
, child
Weight: 0.67
, kid
Weight: 0.66
Siblings girl scout
Weight: 0.75
, girl
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear uniforms 1.00
wear neckerchiefs 0.83
wear backwards flag 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(girl scout, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(girl scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(girl scout, wear uniforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(boy scout, wear uniforms)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(boy scout, wear neckerchiefs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(boy scout, wear neckerchiefs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(boy scout, wear neckerchiefs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(boy scout, wear backwards flag)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(boy scout, wear neckerchiefs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(boy scout, wear backwards flag)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(boy scout, wear backwards flag)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(boy scout, wear backwards flag)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(boy scout, wear uniforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boy scout, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(boy scout, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(girl scout, wear uniforms)