branch: grow on trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.67
, office
Weight: 0.66
, channel
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.36
, post office
Weight: 0.35
, home office
Weight: 0.35
, doctor office
Weight: 0.34
, dental office
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow on trees 1.00
grow in trees 0.99
die on trees 0.90
fall off trees 0.88
be important to tree 0.84
be attached to trees 0.83
grow 0.83
grow at top 0.77
need vine 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(channel, grow)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(branch, grow on trees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(channel, grow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(channel, grow)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(channel, grow)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(branch, grow on trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(branch, grow on trees)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(branch, die on trees)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(branch, grow in trees)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(branch, fall off trees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(branch, grow in trees)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(branch, grow in trees)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(branch, grow on trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(channel, grow)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(branch, grow on trees)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(channel, grow)