branch: have review

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents institution
Weight: 0.67
, office
Weight: 0.66
, channel
Weight: 0.59
, property
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings office building
Weight: 0.36
, post office
Weight: 0.35
, home office
Weight: 0.35
, doctor office
Weight: 0.34
, dental office
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have review 1.00
have power of review 0.91
have judicial review 0.85
have power of judicial review 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(branch, have review)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(branch, have judicial review)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(branch, have judicial review)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(branch, have power of judicial review)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(branch, have power of judicial review)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(branch, have power of review)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(branch, have power of review)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(branch, have judicial review)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(branch, have power of judicial review)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(branch, have power of review)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(branch, have power of review)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(branch, have judicial review)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(branch, have power of judicial review)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(branch, have review)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(branch, have review) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(branch, have review)